TPS types or none at all?
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:09 pm
I'm trying to develop the necessary hardware for fellow Delorean owners to go MS without having to reinvent the wheel each time someone wants to ditch their K-Jetronics mechanical fuel injection system. Several of us (with lots of help from this forum) have gone down the path of alternate manifolds (getting rare), re-purposed throttle bodes and other customizations to get up and running. Now that I have my stock intake manifold, throttle body and other obsoleted parts sitting on the bench, it looks like there could be a generic "kit" that could be created.
Here's the biggest hurdle: Because of the location and design of the throttle body and throttle spool, getting a shaft mounted TPS is pretty much out of the question. So, I'm either looking to find some kind of linear or cable pull TPS to operate off the linkage. But why not just run without a TPS? What would I be giving up? I find that in configuring my acceleration enhancement, TPS is not as good as MAP in any case. If speed density as the fueling algorithm, TPS isn't used, is it? Alpha_N would be lost as an option, as would flood clearing.
Are there other negatives to not having a TPS that I'm missing? Could flood clearing be achieved via another method? Thanks for any suggestions.
Here's the biggest hurdle: Because of the location and design of the throttle body and throttle spool, getting a shaft mounted TPS is pretty much out of the question. So, I'm either looking to find some kind of linear or cable pull TPS to operate off the linkage. But why not just run without a TPS? What would I be giving up? I find that in configuring my acceleration enhancement, TPS is not as good as MAP in any case. If speed density as the fueling algorithm, TPS isn't used, is it? Alpha_N would be lost as an option, as would flood clearing.
Are there other negatives to not having a TPS that I'm missing? Could flood clearing be achieved via another method? Thanks for any suggestions.