Should that not read: If a pulse is NOT received before X+PulseTol, a tooth is assumed to have been missed. ?Megamanual wrote:If a pulse is NOT received after X+PulseTol, a tooth is assumed to have been missed.
Megamanual correct? (Next Pulse Tolerance)
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.
If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0).
If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days
The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
-
Philip Lochner
- Helpful Squirter
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:18 am
- Location: South Africa
- Contact:
Megamanual correct? (Next Pulse Tolerance)
Philip
'74 Jensen Interceptor Mk3 (MS-2 EFI, GPIO + GM 4L60e)
'80 Jaguar XJS 5.3L V12* (MS-2 EFI + dual EDIS-6)
and about 10 others.
Re: Megamanual correct? (Next Pulse Tolerance)
-
Philip Lochner
- Helpful Squirter
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:18 am
- Location: South Africa
- Contact:
Re: Megamanual correct? (Next Pulse Tolerance)
That is how I understand it which is why I think a rewording of the manual might help:
Megamanual:
So if the time between the last two events is X, then if then next pulse occurs within X-PulseTol, it is rejected as a false trigger. If a pulse is NOT received after X+PulseTol, a tooth is assumed to have been missed.
Suggestion:
So if the time between the last two events is X, then, if the next pulse is NOT received after X-PulseTol and before X+PulseTol, a tooth is assumed to have been missed. If a pulse occurs before X-PulseTol or after X+PulseTol, it is rejected as a false trigger.
Philip
'74 Jensen Interceptor Mk3 (MS-2 EFI, GPIO + GM 4L60e)
'80 Jaguar XJS 5.3L V12* (MS-2 EFI + dual EDIS-6)
and about 10 others.
Re: Megamanual correct? (Next Pulse Tolerance)
The algorithm isn't perfect, but its main purpose is not to correct for noise/ weak detection, it is to minimize the chance of ending up with an incorrect tooth count and not knowing it. That is why it resynchs pretty quickly if everything isn't right.