X-Tau versus Acceleration Wizard

For discussing B&G MS-I/MS-II set-up and tuning of fuel parameters (including idle valves, etc.).
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. Many users will not reply if the answer is already available in the manual.

If your question is about troubleshooting, configuration, or tuning, you MUST include your processor type (MS-I or MS-II) and code version in your post. If your question is about PCB assembly or modifications, you must also include the main board version number (1.01, 2.2 or 3.0). For tuning/troubleshooting questions, please attached a datalog and your MSQ file to your post.

If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra code configuration or tuning, please post them at www.msextra.com Such questions posted here will be moved to: a temporary MSextra sub-forum, where they will be removed after 7 days

The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
Post Reply
gboone
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:27 pm

X-Tau versus Acceleration Wizard

Post by gboone »

I finally have my VE table dialed in very close so I think it's time to focus on acceleration enrichment. After studying the manual, it's unclear what method to use, X-Tau or Accel Wizard in Megatune for my application. I have individual throttle bodies, so I would like a recommendation on which method to use. Which is better for ITB's, or am I supposed to use both? I plan to autocross my car in a few days for the first time since the EFI conversion from carburetors, so I would like to know how to proceed soon from here.
Thanks,
Gary
Gary
Matt Cramer
Super Squirter
Posts: 2951
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:35 am

Re: X-Tau versus Acceleration Wizard

Post by Matt Cramer »

You would need to use one or the other. Acceleration Wizard is a bit simpler to tune, and if you are running speed density I would use it since the Acceleration Wizard lets you combine speed density fuel metering with TPS-based acceleration. X-Tau requires the same sensor input for the main fueling and acceleration but can in theory be a bit more accurate.
Post Reply